Timing is a fascinating thing. I've been working on an essay/paper looking at how the Doctrine of the Image of God might be grounds for working towards a theology and ethics of social media. While I've been doing so, in my social media channels (Twitter, Facebook, Google+, etc) over the last few days there have been quite a few people sharing a video from a Ukranian woman, about the state of things in the capital, Kiev. You can watch it below.
It is short, she is easy to understand, and it sounds terrible. You should all do something about it. Like share it, like it, retweet it, G+ it, reblog it, you know the deal.
Shouldn't you?
"Who Remembers #KONY2012?
Or "Love Jesus, Hate Religion?
Anyone still praying or tweeting about #Nadarkhani?"
I summed up with a challenge.
"to what extent are we (and I'd include myself in this) reducing our Christianity from a full-life pursuit of God's kingdom, into a sunday+social-media-when-its-convenient-Christianity?"
"the more public the token show of endorsement, the less likely participants are to provide meaningful support later"
I think that is absolutely true. And it sits well with one of the strands I've been teasing out of my essay/paper reading, that everything done in the name of Jesus (be it worship, social justice, mission, evangelism, fellowship, pastoral care, etc) has to be local, contextual and grounded in the real world. 1000 likes equates to precisely zero actual support, unless some of those 'likes' quite literally put their money where their mouth is. I subscribe to the point of view that worship is the sum of our lives lived out before God, and Shane Hipps writes that "worship should give serious consideration to the context of the gathered community", which has a challenging implication for those of us who think that social media is a sufficient form of 'activism'.
Christian activisim, Christian mission, everything 'Christian' has to find its ground in the Incarnation, the coming of God in the man Jesus to earth to save sinners and reconcile them to God. God starts a relationship with us, as a relational God, through his embodiment, life and death as Jesus. Christians should resist easy 'slacktivism'. Instead, our approach to social justice, societal change, and the coming of the Kingdom of God must be real and embodied, and Philip Meadows identifies this as flowing out of the principle of love thy neighbour, "through tangible works of piety and mercy".
I know my limits. I can't solve the problem in Kiev. I can pray for it, for the individual image-bearers on both sides of the battle, for all the sinners and saints caught up in violence, corruption and injustice. I can do what I can do - and so can you. What 'tangible works of piety and mercy' can you do, in Jesus name? What can you to embody an online passion, to show the world that Jesus' name and his coming kingdom means more to you than 'likes' or 'comments' on Facebook?
____________________
I realise that I've not exactly provided answers here, and that there is an irony, perhaps, in blogging about this. But consider going and reading Philip Meadows article (info here), Shane Hipps' "The Hidden Power of Electronic Cultre: How Media Shapes Faith, The Gospel, and Church", and my post on the aforementioned paper (and indeed the related conference!). One of the wonderful things about the internet is it makes it quite easy to actually do something, so consider supporting something like Theology on the Web, sponsoring a child with World Vision, or any of the myriad of wonderful opportunities that are available to anyone with an internet connection and a bank account. And as ever, please do leave comments and suggestions, nothing I write here should ever be seen as the final word!
____________________________

Yes. Thank you for these thoughts, Tom. I think we often do a similarly 'slacktivist' thing when we lower our goals to 'raising awareness' about something rather than winning hearts and minds.
ReplyDeleteAnother thing your article made me wonder about was how Christians in the days before mass communication thought about such things. How much could, say, Jonathan Edwards worry about the 1721 Madras cyclone or the 1755 Lisbon earthquake, when if he heard of them at all it would be weeks or months after the fact?
Hi Phil, thanks for the comment.
DeleteI think that is a really good question, and maybe touches on something I nearly wrote about here, but didn't for the sake of brevity. I think one issue is that people don't have a long term (forward or backwards!) view of things, and that social media is a symptom and cause of that. The historical question you raise is fascinating - perhaps our modern connectivity serves to make us worry more about things we quite literally cannot effect - even as we might like to, and we can/do know the one who holds such events in his hand?
thanks for your thought provoking comment.
Tom