In my travels through England and theological reading, I've picked up a few books that don't easily fit into my limited library, and also turn up blank faces from friends when I ask them about the tomes. The latest of these - to me - is Dogmatic vs Biblical Theology, a collection of essays by Catholic theologians edited by Herbert Vorgrimler (awesome name). This little hardback book, in a fetching faded olive green from Burns & Oates, bears both the 'Nihil Obstat' and 'Imprimatur' from the Catholic Church. For those who don't know, and I quote;
"The Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur are official declarations that a book or pamphlet is free of doctrinal or moral error. No implication is contained therein that those who have granted the Nihil Obstrat and Imprimatur agree with the opinions expressed"
Sacred Scripture and Word of God
- Karl Hermann Schelkle
Exegesis and Dogmatic Theology
- Karl Rahner, S.J.
Progress and Problems in New Testament Exegesis
- Anton Vogtle
The Meaning and Function of a Theology of the New Testament
- Heinrich Schiler
Exegesis, Dogmatics and the Development of Dogma
- Eduard Schillebeeckx, O.P.
The Dogmatic Evaluation of the New Testament
- Rudolph Schnakcenburg
Transposition of Themes as Principle of Form and Tradition in the Old Testament
- Heinrich Gross
The Historical Jesus and the Christ of Faith
- Franz Mussner
Dogmatic Considerations on Knowledge and Consciousness in Christ
- Karl Rahner, S.J.
I hope to explore some of the essays/themes in this book over a few blog posts - partly to highlight the complexities and difficulties of 'Catholic' theology, but also to consider the important question of the 'vs' in the title - asking whether or not Dogmatic/Systematic and Biblical theological endeavours have to be 'vs'.
______________________
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hey! Thanks for commenting. I'll try to moderate it as soon as possible