Pages

Thursday, 19 April 2012

Miscellaneous Post on Gender + Grace


This post is one I've submitted to the Good Men Project - which featured my piece on 'Sugar Daddies' before, and is an interesting online conversation. I don't yet know if it will be run - if it does, I'll add a link to this post to it.

The submission is in a response to the nebulous abstract: 

"Most of us were raised surrounded by religious, spiritual and ethical messages. How has your encounter with religion/ethics influenced your experiences and views on gender? Does your faith/ethical system have messages about what it means to be a “good (or bad) man?” Did they help or harm you or both? How have you processed or refined those messages as an adult? If you have children, how do you address these concerns? Good Men Project wants to know."


______________

It’s been a while since I last wrote for the Good Men Project - but I’ve been avidly reading bits and bobs, and keeping up to date on the calls for submissions.

This one interested me.


Being 21, engaged to be married, Christian, fairly Conservative and White and male probably makes me a minority these days. If it doesn’t, then there’s still work to do for some people.


I want to say something that will be immensely unpopular, but I hope also challenging, refreshing, and in some way reasonable. I’ve been raised in a Christian household, attended Church - at first unwillingly, then willingly - all my life, and this reflects on my understanding of life, gender, and ethics.


I’m marrying a wonderful, beautiful, out-of-my-league-except-by-what-we-Christians-call-God’s-Grace Christian girl from a similar but different background. Thats always been expected of me - though I could easil have gone a number of ways. My parents - wonderful Christian Conservative Calvinists that they are - have always encouraged me to examine, question, and think about things. And, actually, honestly, the Christian ethic and approach to gender - or, at least the one I know and live - definitively works for me.


It’s conventional to bash those of us who hold a conservative, or more derogatorily, ‘traditional’ ethic regarding sex, gender, and masculinity - But I’m very grateful for it. I’ve had to adapt over the years as different people, different perspectives and different lifestyles made their mark on my life - but I’m slowly learning that Jesus’ ethic really is the best way to live.


Relating to others - loving others - as you would have them relate to yourself. Wanting the best - God’s best - for them above your own interests. Hoping for the best possible outcome. Being sacrificial in hospitality. These are things that define my ethics - even as I completely fail to realize them on a regular basis. I’m still human - I’m not Jesus.


My views on Gender have evolved as I - and my faith - have started to reach this strange process called ‘maturity’. I’ve been involved in reading all sorts of things since coming to university - I discovered that a traditional, hierarchalist mentality singularly failed to be useful in an academic context - even the faith-friendly discipline of theology. But, actually, the core of that traditional understanding remains entirely valid. Not universal, but definitively applicable. I honestly believe that there are two ‘kinds’ - Male and Female. I believe that identity is not restricted or limited to gender (or sexuality, or class, or race, or preference, or anything like that), and think that psychology has a huge amount to teach us about how gender identity is constructed.


Regarding gender roles - and I’m sure this will be unpopular - I DO think there is a difference between men and women. I’m reminded of an older, brilliant pastor, who said (the man has 3 daughters!) that his girls could be anything - except a husband, a father, or an elder. I think that rings true - the latter being fairly irrelevant in a secular sense. I believe that there is a distinction - which goes to the heart of our language - between male and female - but I also accept the need for space for those who do not conform or ‘fit’ so easily into those definitions. In fact, my faith and faith-ethics have equipped me to be prepared for those who don’t wish to define as ‘normal’, whatever that may mean.


One of the things I am consistently learning and re-learning about God is that God is infinitely bigger, more varied, wildly loving, and diverse than I could have imagined. I believe God is ultimately concerned with good - and with order - even though sometimes circumstances - especially in the lives of individuals - don’t seem to reflect that. But I hope in something, believe in something, that gives an innate worth to EVERY human being - regardless of what they do, are, or think. No-one, in my understanding, is beyond redemption.


And that is where the Christian idea of Grace - in a salvific and relational sense - is so useful.


With Grace, I can talk to people I can’t understand and utterly disagree with.


With Grace, I can start to change and be open to different things.


With Grace, I can be immensely grateful for what God has done in my life - and seek to uphold that in the lives of others.


I might be wrong about things. Thats part of the job description of a man. But I’m trying to do the best with my limited faculties. That, for me, is what being a good man is. Treating others with Grace - because God did first, and because it’s what I believe I’m called to do. And so I’m grateful for my background, even as I understand and research more and more of whats going on.

4 comments:

  1. I enjoy following your blog Creedy but I must confess that after reading this posting I'm about as uncertain of your views on gender as I was before I read it.

    It reads like you are using vagueness as a means of trying to appear polite and ramblings about open-mindedness and grace as an apology for the little you actually do say on your declared subject of choice.

    Tell me what your really think about gender and this time be balls-out Creedy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Joshua, thanks for the comment!

    This is predominantly a post for a secular audience - hence intended ambiguity.

    Will gladly post something about my views on gender/gender roles. Tomorrow, once I am back at home amongst my books, rather than with the future in laws, preparing for marriage, looking at spatulas etc.

    Grateful for the challenge, looking forward to writing!

    Tom

    ReplyDelete
  3. Enjoyed your remark about the "mass feminist de-friending" on Facebook!

    Don't worry. I'm sure they will be gracious and open minded about what you have to say.

    Other than forced castration with a spoon, you should have nothing to fear.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Joshua- what are your views on gender and masculinity/femininity?

    ReplyDelete

Hey! Thanks for commenting. I'll try to moderate it as soon as possible